eurammon’s experts Janos Winter, Refrigeration Consultant at QPlan, and Bernd Kaltenbrunner, Managing Director at KWN Engineering and member of the eurammon Board, explain how natural refrigerants can be put to energy- and cost-efficient use.
Whether in food production or in the manufacturing of chemicals or medical drugs, refrigeration and air conditioning are essential parts of the production process and subsequent storage. In light of this, natural refrigerants offer the most environmentally friendly option for refrigeration applications, as they have no impact on the greenhouse effect. But the potential of natural refrigerants goes beyond just the ecological advantages. They also offer economic advantages.
You have drawn up a payback calculation that shows both the economical and ecological advantages of using natural refrigerants. How did you go about calculating this?
Janos Winter: Basically, there is one main thing that has to be taken into account: when calculating the payback period of an investment, it is important to consider all the costs incurred throughout the entire lifecycle. The total operating costs include the initial outlay and all subsequent costs for the plant, together with the costs for repairs, energy, maintenance and service. It is in this area in particular that plants operating with natural refrigerants are so convincing. Thanks to the lower operating costs, the initial outlay for these refrigeration systems can be recouped after just a few years.
So, the payback period for a system is calculated according to the entire lifecycle. Are systems with natural refrigerants also particularly economical in terms of their service life?
Janos Winter: We cannot really generalise here. The service life can vary in each individual case. The lifecycle of a system depends on various aspects, such as the technical concept and the specific application or external factors, such as climatic conditions. High outside temperatures, for example, require a greater refrigerating capacity. And so, each application has to be viewed individually and compared with suitable alternatives. But in most cases, it is usually easy to find alternative applications with natural refrigerants that offer a long lifecycle, which, therefore, also makes them more economical.
It is difficult to compare various systems using differing refrigerants. Nevertheless, are there any reference values or key figures that give an indication of how energy-efficient a system is?
Janos Winter: Definitely. For example, when we compare the annual energy consumption of refrigeration systems, we use software-based computation programs, such as “Pack Calculation”, which was developed by the Danish IPU Institute. It takes account of most aspects of technical implementation as well as the climatic conditions. One thing transpires here again and again: ecological and economic advantages often make natural refrigerants the best choice for nearly every application.
Which requirements have to be taken into consideration when planning a system with natural refrigerants?
Bernd Kaltenbrunner: Basically, the same planning requirements apply as for synthetic refrigerants. But the increased safety requirements for systems with natural refrigerants mean that particular care must be taken in all aspects of operating safety. In addition, it is also important to give due consideration during the planning phase due to the fact that, as a general rule, systems with natural refrigerants have a long service life of up to 25 years and more.
Ammonia is a refrigerant with outstanding thermodynamic properties that is deemed to be particularly efficient. Do systems with ammonia offer the greatest potential for saving costs and energy?
Bernd Kaltenbrunner: Ammonia systems, in particular are convincing in terms of their long service life. Accordingly, the planning procedure for these systems gives especially careful consideration to the sustainable selection of individual components in the interests of long-term energy and cost efficiency. This already gives ammonia systems a clear advantage over other systems in terms of potential savings. But in every profitability analysis, the operator also has to decide which approach he wants to take for his system. Experience shows that environmental aspects, in particular, play an increasingly important role in this process. And ammonia offers clear advantages with regard to environmental concerns. This gives us two powerful arguments that explain why ammonia systems have already become an established force in the refrigeration industry.
In which branches do natural refrigerants make particular economic sense?
Bernd Kaltenbrunner: Natural refrigerants are recommended for companies in every branch of industry that set store not only by the environment, but also by business indicators. The key point here is that ecological awareness and economic efficiency are mutually compatible when natural refrigerants are used.
What role do operating costs play in refrigeration systems? Is this another area where systems with natural refrigerants can rate highly?
Janos Winter: Systems with natural refrigerants generate considerable savings, particularly when it comes to the lifecycle costs. Increasing annual operating hours make energy costs a crucial factor. A direct comparison shows that this is an area where natural refrigerants really stand out, as they permit more energy-efficient refrigerating machines. But energy efficiency depends on more than just the choice of refrigerant: It is also affected by external environmental factors, the specific design of a system or the level of training that the operators have had.
There are many successful examples to illustrate the efficient use of natural refrigerants. Could you name a project that gives a particularly clear demonstration of this increased efficiency?
Janos Winter: The retail sector is clearly the pioneer here, particularly in supermarket refrigeration, with systems using natural refrigerants. In Scandinavia, for example, we have seen particularly high-efficiency rates in systems with natural refrigerants in this sector, resulting, among other factors, also from the advanced state of knowledge among planners and clients. In Hungary, too, there are clear demonstrations of the energy advantages of natural refrigerants in supermarkets. NH3/CO2 cascade systems, in particular, generate annual energy savings of up to 35% compared to similar HFC systems.
To foster the development of “green refrigeration”, some countries offer subsidies for systems with natural refrigerants, while others even put a tax on refrigerants with a detrimental effect on the environment. What is the situation in Germany?
Bernd Kaltenbrunner: Through the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), the German government offers a subsidy for climate protection measures in industrial refrigeration systems. If the subsidy criteria are fulfilled, a maximum of €200,000 of the net investment costs are refunded. Needless to say, refrigeration systems with natural refrigerants are also subsidised, as they rate above all other options when it comes to efficiency; and furthermore, they cause no harm to the environment. The extremely low global warming potential – ammonia, for example, has a GWP value of 0 – also naturally plays a major role in obtaining subsidies from the BMU.